2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1980 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 412 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki Alto.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 604 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki Alto. (60 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1980 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Viper | Alto |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7999 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 38 HP |
Torque | 664 Nm | 60 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.6 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2160 mm |