2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1983 Holden Camira
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Holden Camira would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (1,154 Nm) has 1029 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1983 Holden Camira | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Viper | Camira |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7990 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 1154 Nm | 125 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2580 mm |