2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1989 Dodge Lancer

To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Dodge Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Dodge Lancer would be higher. At 8,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (501 HP) has 405 more horse power than 1989 Dodge Lancer. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1989 Dodge Lancer.

Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Dodge Viper 1989 Dodge Lancer
Make Dodge Dodge
Model Viper Lancer
Year Released 2000 1989
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 8000 cc 2212 cc
Engine Cylinders 10 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 501 HP 96 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2630 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]