2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (1,154 Nm) has 937 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (217 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Viper | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7990 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 1154 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.8 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2740 mm |