2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 8,357 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Viper weights approximately 230 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (979 Nm) has 807 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Viper | Apollo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8357 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 979 Nm | 172 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2610 mm |