2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 233 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 444 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Viper | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Viper | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7999 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 664 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2350 mm |
