2000 Dodge Viper vs. 1997 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 8,357 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Viper weights approximately 40 kg more than 1997 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (979 Nm) has 781 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 1997 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Viper | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8357 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 979 Nm | 198 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2840 mm |