2000 Dodge Viper vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Viper would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 300 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Viper | 3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7999 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 664 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2650 mm |