2000 Dodge Viper vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Viper would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 280 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (170 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2000 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Viper | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7999 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 664 Nm | 226 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2800 mm |