2000 Dodge Viper vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Viper would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Viper | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Dodge | Fisker |
| Model | Viper | Karma |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 501 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3160 mm |
