2000 Dodge Viper vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Viper would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 210 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Viper | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Viper | Commodore |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7999 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 664 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |