2000 Dodge Viper vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Viper would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 650 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Viper. (450 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Viper.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Viper | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
| Make | Dodge | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Viper | Agera |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7999 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 1100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Biofuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |
