2000 Donkervoort D8 vs. 1975 Zastava 132
To start off, 2000 Donkervoort D8 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Donkervoort D8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Donkervoort D8 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 132. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Donkervoort D8 should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Zastava 132 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2000 Donkervoort D8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Donkervoort D8 (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Donkervoort D8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Donkervoort D8 | 1975 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Donkervoort | Zastava |
Model | D8 | 132 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2560 mm |