2000 Donkervoort D8 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Donkervoort D8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Donkervoort D8 would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2002 Suzuki F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Donkervoort D8 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Donkervoort D8 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 845 kg more than 2000 Donkervoort D8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Donkervoort D8 (210 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2000 Donkervoort D8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 2000 Donkervoort D8 has manual transmission. 2000 Donkervoort D8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Donkervoort D8 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Donkervoort | Suzuki |
Model | D8 | F1 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2210 mm |