2000 Eagle Talon vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 2000 Eagle Talon is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Eagle Talon (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Eagle Talon should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Eagle Talon weights approximately 682 kg more than 1965 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Eagle Talon | 1965 Renault 8 | |
Make | Eagle | Renault |
Model | Talon | 8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2280 mm |