2000 Eagle Talon vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Eagle Talon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Eagle Talon (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Eagle Talon should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Eagle Talon weights approximately 102 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Eagle Talon (290 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2000 Eagle Talon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Eagle Talon | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Eagle | Nissan |
Model | Talon | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |