2000 Eagle Vision vs. 1956 Morris Minor
To start off, 2000 Eagle Vision is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Morris Minor would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1956 Morris Minor. (30 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1956 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Eagle Vision weights approximately 745 kg more than 1956 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Eagle Vision | 1956 Morris Minor | |
Make | Eagle | Morris |
Model | Vision | Minor |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 803 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |