2000 Eagle Vision vs. 1971 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2000 Eagle Vision is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1971 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1971 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Eagle Vision weights approximately 830 kg more than 1971 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Eagle Vision | 1971 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Eagle | ZAZ |
| Model | Vision | 966 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2700 cc | 885 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
