2000 Eagle Vision vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Eagle Vision (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Eagle Vision | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Eagle | Holden |
Model | Vision | Epica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |