2000 Eagle Vision vs. 2012 Kia Optima
To start off, 2012 Kia Optima is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Optima (200 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2000 Eagle Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Eagle Vision weights approximately 108 kg more than 2012 Kia Optima.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Eagle Vision | 2012 Kia Optima | |
Make | Eagle | Kia |
Model | Vision | Optima |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1462 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4844 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1831 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1455 mm |