2000 Fiat Barchetta vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Fiat Barchetta is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Fiat Barchetta (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Barchetta should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2000 Fiat Barchetta.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Barchetta (164 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Fiat Barchetta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Fiat Barchetta | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Fiat | Triumph |
Model | Barchetta | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 164 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2700 mm |