2000 Fiat Siena vs. 1955 Rover P4
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,102 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Rover P4 (74 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Rover P4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Rover P4 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2000 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Rover P4. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Fiat Siena | 1955 Rover P4 | |
Make | Fiat | Rover |
Model | Siena | P4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2102 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 150 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1390 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 52 L |