2000 Fiat Siena vs. 1963 Maserati Quattroporte

To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Maserati Quattroporte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Maserati Quattroporte would be higher. At 4,136 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Maserati Quattroporte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Maserati Quattroporte (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Maserati Quattroporte should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Maserati Quattroporte weights approximately 400 kg more than 2000 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Maserati Quattroporte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Maserati Quattroporte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Maserati Quattroporte (362 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1963 Maserati Quattroporte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Fiat Siena.

Compare all specifications: