2000 Fiat Siena vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (258 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Fiat Siena | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | Fiat | Mercury |
| Model | Siena | Comet |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 3279 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
