2000 Fiat Siena vs. 1967 Jaguar 240

To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2000 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Fiat Siena.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Fiat Siena 1967 Jaguar 240
Make Fiat Jaguar
Model Siena 240
Year Released 2000 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1910 cc 3442 cc
Horse Power 51 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 200 Nm 300 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1300 kg 1520 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 54 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]