2000 Fiat Siena vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Belmont (108 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Fiat Siena weights approximately 10 kg more than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (246 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Fiat Siena | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Siena | Belmont |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 3043 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 246 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1290 kg |