2000 Fiat Siena vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 2000 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (116 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Fiat Siena weights approximately 450 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Fiat Siena | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Fiat | Lotus |
| Model | Siena | Elan |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1558 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 850 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 45 L |
