2000 Fiat Siena vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Fiat Siena weights approximately 340 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Fiat Siena | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Siena | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2292 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 960 kg |
