2000 Fiat Siena vs. 1976 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 2000 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Zastava 1500 (70 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Fiat Siena weights approximately 290 kg more than 1976 Zastava 1500.
Because 1976 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm). This means 2000 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Fiat Siena | 1976 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Fiat | Zastava |
Model | Siena | 1500 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1480 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 113 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1010 kg |