2000 Fiat Siena vs. 1986 Holden Barina
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Barina would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 2000 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Holden Barina (67 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Fiat Siena weights approximately 570 kg more than 1986 Holden Barina.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Barina. (104 Nm). This means 2000 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Barina. 1986 Holden Barina has automatic transmission and 2000 Fiat Siena has manual transmission. 2000 Fiat Siena will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Holden Barina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Fiat Siena | 1986 Holden Barina | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Siena | Barina |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1323 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 104 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 730 kg |