2000 Fiat Siena vs. 2002 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Fiat Siena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Fiat Siena would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 2000 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Fiat Siena weights approximately 5 kg more than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Because 2002 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm). This means 2000 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Fiat Siena | 2002 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Siena | Econovan |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1789 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 138 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1295 kg |