2000 Fiat Siena vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Fiat Siena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Fiat Siena would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 2000 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2000 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (244 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Fiat Siena | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Siena | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1837 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 244 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1410 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |