2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 1951 Rover P4
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,103 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford 24.7 (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1951 Rover P4. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7 should accelerate faster than 1951 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Rover P4 weights approximately 182 kg more than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Because 1951 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford 24.7 (359 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Rover P4. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Ford 24.7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford 24.7 | 1951 Rover P4 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | 24.7 | P4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2103 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |