2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford 24.7 weights approximately 68 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford 24.7 | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
| Model | 24.7 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2190 mm |
