2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 1966 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford 24.7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford 24.7 (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1966 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford 24.7 weights approximately 576 kg more than 1966 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford 24.7 (359 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Renault Dauphine. (58 Nm). This means 2000 Ford 24.7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford 24.7 | 1966 Renault Dauphine | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | 24.7 | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 58 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 632 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2280 mm |
