2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 998 kg more than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Because 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford 24.7 | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 24.7 | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 6749 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3040 mm |