2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford 24.7 (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7 should accelerate faster than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford 24.7 weights approximately 38 kg more than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford 24.7 (359 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. (158 Nm). This means 2000 Ford 24.7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford 24.7 | 1984 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | 24.7 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |