2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 1997 Jeep Icon
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Icon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Icon would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Icon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Jeep Icon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Jeep Icon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford 24.7 has automatic transmission and 1997 Jeep Icon has manual transmission. 1997 Jeep Icon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford 24.7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford 24.7 | 1997 Jeep Icon | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | 24.7 | Icon |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |
