2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford 24.7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 75 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 75 weights approximately 242 kg more than 2000 Ford 24.7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford 24.7 (359 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (185 Nm). This means 2000 Ford 24.7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford 24.7 | 1998 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | 24.7 | 75 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |
