2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford 24.7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford 24.7 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 631 kg more than 2000 Ford 24.7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford 24.7. (359 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford 24.7 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | 24.7 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 383 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1839 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
