2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford 24.7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford 24.7 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford 24.7 (359 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden UTE. (340 Nm). This means 2000 Ford 24.7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden UTE. 2000 Ford 24.7 has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2008 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford 24.7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford 24.7 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | 24.7 | UTE |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 359 Nm | 340 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |