2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford 24.7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford 24.7 would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford 24.7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (570 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford 24.7. (359 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford 24.7 | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | 24.7 | Range Rover Sport |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 570 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2880 mm |
