2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford 24.7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford 24.7 would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford 24.7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford 24.7. (359 Nm). This means 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford 24.7 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | 24.7 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 700 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2891 mm |