2000 Ford 24.7 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford 24.7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford 24.7 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2000 Ford 24.7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford 24.7 (359 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (228 Nm). This means 2000 Ford 24.7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford 24.7 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 24.7 | 3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 359 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2639 mm |