2000 Ford Artic vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 493 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 1950 Saab 92 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Artic | 92 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2480 mm |