2000 Ford Artic vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 198 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1951 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1951 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Artic | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | Artic | A6G |
Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2560 mm |