2000 Ford Artic vs. 1967 Lancia Flaminia

To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Lancia Flaminia (148 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Lancia Flaminia should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Lancia Flaminia weights approximately 122 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Lancia Flaminia. (225 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Lancia Flaminia. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1967 Lancia Flaminia has manual transmission. 1967 Lancia Flaminia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: