2000 Ford Artic vs. 1970 Toyota Crown

To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Artic (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1970 Toyota Crown. (108 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Artic should accelerate faster than 1970 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 43 kg more than 1970 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Toyota Crown. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Toyota Crown.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Artic 1970 Toyota Crown
Make Ford Toyota
Model Artic Crown
Year Released 2000 1970
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3998 cc 1988 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 128 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 325 Nm 157 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1298 kg 1255 kg
Vehicle Length 5240 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3200 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 70 L