2000 Ford Artic vs. 1976 Holden Statesman

To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Holden Statesman (213 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Holden Statesman should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Holden Statesman weights approximately 247 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Holden Statesman (400 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 1976 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1976 Holden Statesman has manual transmission. 1976 Holden Statesman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: