2000 Ford Artic vs. 1977 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 248 kg more than 1977 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1977 Lotus Eclat has manual transmission. 1977 Lotus Eclat will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Artic | 1977 Lotus Eclat | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Artic | Eclat |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3998 cc | 1973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2490 mm |
